The new landlord of a once gay-friendly pub was fined £500 yesterday after placing a sign outside reading: “Faggots and mince not on the menu!".
The homophobic slur was scrawled on a blackboard outside the Anchor and Hope in Trowbridge just a few days after landlord Adrian Taylor, 53, moved in.
Police were alerted by the previous tenants - two gay men - and Taylor was charged with causing “harassment, alarm or distress” under Section 5 of the Public Order Act.
Yesterday, Taylor appeared at Chippenham Magistrates’ Court in Wiltshire, where he denied writing the sign himself but admitted he found it amusing.
Magistrates rejected claims by his legal team that the phrase “faggot” is only offensive to homosexuals in America and it could have related to food.
They found Taylor guilty because he failed to remove the sign for 24 hours after being asked to remove it.
Sentencing him to a £500 fine, magistrate Lynn Mathews said: “The sign was offensive and in direct relation to the former landlords.
“It is naive to think that faggots and mince is a simple reference to food. I am sure that Mr Taylor knew the sign was insensitive.
“Mr Taylor, you must realise that society will not tolerate this behaviour.”
Former landlords John Williams, 40, and his partner Lee Skaife, 26, had run the pub in Trowbridge for 15 months until Mr Williams had an angina attack in September 2006. They said the pub was gay-friendly but never run as a gay bar. But they were outraged when they drove past the pub on May 3 this year and spotted the blackboard sign.
Mr Skaife, who is now manager of a shoe shop, said: “We could see the sign from the road when were driving past.
“I took it to mean it was about my sexuality and it was about being gay. We didn’t even know who the new landlord was.
“We knew a new person had taken it over and we had told the locals to support him because so many people failed to make that pub successful.
“But the sign was saying we were faggots. I found this extremely offensive. I have been suffering from anxiety since the incident.”
Mr Skaife immediately called his mother Carol, a secretary, who phoned Taylor and then alerted the police.
She said: “I called the pub and said I wanted to know if they were selling faggots and mince. I asked the landlord what he meant by this and he said it was called a sense of humour.
“I replied that I found it offensive and would be calling my solicitor. I called the police after the phone call.”
Taylor, who is still running the pub, failed to remove the sign for almost 24 hours despite also being contacted by police.
He told the court: “When I first saw the sign I smiled. I did not write it myself and I don’t know who did. At the time I couldn’t see why it would be offensive.
“I still stand by the fact that I have done nothing wrong. I can’t be responsible for every member of public who walks past.
“The sign is easily accessible from the road. Anyone could have written it.”
Malcolm Wick, for Taylor, claimed the word faggot was only offensive to homosexuals in America and that was why the landlord failed to understand it was a slur.
While cross-examining Mr Skaife, he said: “You thought that the sign was a sexual innuendo against you. But it could be describing a dish, couldn’t it?”
Speaking outside court, Mr Williams, who is now a hairdresser, said: “This case isn’t just for us, it’s for every gay person across the world.
“Nobody should have to be the victim of this type of crime when so much has changed for the homosexual community.
“It isn’t about the fine or the amount, it is about the fact they found him guilty.
“Maybe it will make others think twice before committing these crimes in the future.”
Taylor refused to comment outside court but vowed to appeal against the conviction.
Editor, . The more the law is used in circumstances such as these, the more the population will react against it I believe. . As was shown with the ‘Doggers on the Downs’ recently. . If the Pub had previously been a Lap Dancing Club and someone had written something derogatory about ‘Slappers and Ogglers’; Would anyone have ‘Given a Toss’? . Perhaps it’s the morals and sexuality of those making judgement that needs to be called into question.
Charles Henry
‘LAW-ABIDING MOTORISTS HAVE NOTHING TO FEAR’
With such a disappointing portrayal of this excellent policing tool which made the front page under the banner of “exclusive” ("Drive-by spies", Post, October 15), and a whole column under “Comment” ("Big brother is watching you for sure"), I feel compelled to respond. First of all, the cameras are not hidden.
There are locations where, for obvious reasons, some cannot be seen, such as overhead gantries on the Second Severn Crossing, but otherwise if you really look, (if you are one who would be concerned, that is), you can see all of them.
The strategic location of these cameras has been well thought out with a view to protecting the lives and property of the residents of this police area.
With the current threat level, it would be very irresponsible of the police not to take advantage of every means at their disposal to detect those who use the roads for extremist purposes, to prey on our old folk through distraction burglary or to peddle illegal drugs on the streets of our major towns and cities.
The “exclusive” described a situation which has been in place in this force area and nationally for five years.
Automatic Number Plate Recognition was, in fact, developed by the military more than 30 years ago for counter-terrorism purposes.
Its use by the police across the country started just over five years ago, and for the information of Mister X ("Drivers’ anger at cops’ tactic", Open On-line, October 17), I could fill several editions of the Post with “real policing” stories.
These include the car which was stopped on a sleepy Tuesday morning in Keynsham because ANPR showed it as unregistered, and the driver - after a violent struggle with a lone police motorcyclist - was arrested for armed robbery in London and murder in Jamaica.
Or the stolen car on the Second Severn Crossing which was followed down the M5 by the force helicopter, the occupants arrested and a large amount of crack cocaine seized, and so on and so on.
This - for me, anyway - epitomises real policing in this technological age.
ANPR cameras are capable of reading 3,000 vehicle registration plates per hour of vehicles travelling at up to 100 miles per hour.
The point here is that it is number plates being read and stored (the overview of the car and maybe the occupant or occupants are not available unless there is an alarm), and that information only becomes personal information when very specific action is taken, such as steps to ascertain the registered keeper’s details.
These steps require access codes, personal identification and very specific reasons before the information is divulged, and any police officer or police staff member who breaks the rules is dealt with very severely.
Section 17 of the Crime and Disorder Act 1998 places a legal responsibility on the police to consult with partners on issues such as this. From the outset, lengthy consultation has been undertaken with Crime and Disorder Partnerships across the force area, often involving council cabinets and/or elected representatives.
I have personally given presentations to a variety of audiences about the effectiveness of ANPR because it is no secret, and there has been publicity across all media at various stages during the last five years.
In response to the comment “so every day, when you get in your car to go to work, there is every chance that the police know where you go” - there is no chance that the police know where you go until you give them reason to find out.
To answer the questions “so what if the police have you on film?” - they do not, and “if you haven’t done anything wrong, they’re not going to come knocking on your door, are they?” - no, they are not.
I’ve said a lot, but to all you law-abiding motorists and citizens, the message is simple - this technology is on your side.
Its use by the police - covert or otherwise - will continue in the fight against criminals using the roads.
You have nothing to fear from it.
Graham Watkins,senior project manager,Avon and Somerset Police’s corporate project department.
People like Graham Watkins just don’t seem to get it do they. . Honest people simply don’t wish to be Spied upon. . This argument “If you have done nothing wrong you have nothing to fear", is now wearing a bit thin. . . . Cameras have just become an excuse for Police inactivity. . Crime is no longer being prevented, it is simply being RECORDED. . . When we bring up our children there comes a time when we all let them go out into the wide world, to learn, and to make a few mistakes on their own. . We don’t scrutinise them with secret cameras. . Life away from the glare and gaze of others is a basic human right, and even a necessity. . Mr.Watkins would do well to remember that.
Charles Henry