FARMERS MUST PLAY BY THE RULES OVER TESTING FOR TB
Western Daily Press. . . Features/Letters>
“In response to Gill Purser’s letter (Your Say, April 15), she obviously knows absolutely nothing about the true facts about testing cattle for TB.
Firstly, the farmer has no say in when a test is carried out; that is down to Defra.
Secondly, to have a test every 12 months if you are in a hotspot area is unusual. We are in a hotspot area and have suffered with TB for some 10 years, so we know the true facts with regard to testing.
Our cattle are tested every 60 days, as are everyone else’s in the same situation.". cond. Name and Address supplied.
The reply:
In response to “Name and address supplied” suggesting that I do not know the facts about TB testing (Your Say, May 22), I would point out that a glance at my farm cattle register shows a very high throughput of cattle in our beef unit, all in a TB hotspot, since 1989.
I could not have managed this business over this length of time without a thorough knowledge of the rules governing TB testing. I was entirely accurate with my statement that the minimum statutory requirement for TB testing is once every 12 months in a TB hotspot. This applies in practice to any farm which remains clear of TB and which does not want to move any cattle outside of the 60-day period following the statutory test, during which time cattle can be moved without further testing.
Testing every 60 days is triggered by the need to move cattle from a holding on a more frequent basis and any other additional tests will be in response to cattle which have reacted positively for TB which obviously triggers further testing.
I am more than sympathetic to the frustration of farmers locked up by TB, as I fully understand the horrors of movement restrictions, having been in the business throughout the BSE crisis and the two FMD debacles.
But this is no excuse for them to lash out in a fit of pique at either me or, worse still, the defenceless badger.
Gill Purser Cheltenham
I used to know a traffic warden like Gill Purser. She knew all the rules but really had no idea how it impacted on business. . It turned out she used to be a bus driver before she got married, but she really wanted to be a Police Woman(man). . We must be politically correct mustn’t we!
Charles Henry
SELLING BATH A PIG IN A POKE
So the pigs have landed, well and truly, in Bath. I mean, “Art off and trotting” (Western Daily Press, May 20), something to do with a hammy idea dreamed up by an ex-B &NES councillor, it appears.
No public corner of Bath seems safe from the “Invasion of the Porkers". They might look pretty in their multi-colours. Some may even regard them as an innocent bit of fun, with a beneficial end product, ie, when eventually they are auctioned off, all monies are to be donated to the Two Tunnels project.And (apparently) no taxpayers’ money has been spent on them. Well, there’s a first.
The frivolity of Bath playing host to a herd of pigs might have been excusable if the council masterminding the scheme had any credibility to rely on, or any laurels to rest on, but it hasn’t.
You won’t have to look far to find filthy, graffiti-strewn public toilets, buildings in prominent locations shoddily maintained and crumbling, “to let” signs in abundance.
And what petty distraction do B &NES come up with in the face of all this to attempt to put a shiny gloss over the dirt? Why, a posse of plastic pigs, that’s what.
Sadly, for all the grip on the reality of life in 21st-century Bath that the present administration are showing in this sorry little vignette, the models on display might just as well assume the shape of dinosaurs.
Keith Davis, Bath
This is a very well written piece Editor. . I congratulate Keith Davis on his acuity and yourself for bringing it to us on this depressingly normal late Spring Bank holiday, presumably to lift our spirits.
Charles Henry